Stop Pricing Guitars by Country: Jason Isbell Just Gave Pawnshops a Reality Check
- Mark Kurkdjian
- 20 hours ago
- 3 min read
If you’re pricing guitars by the stamp on the headstock, you’re trading profit for a tidy story.
Jason Isbell didn’t just make a wardrobe choice — he made a market-point: “people pay for their biases – people will pay more to reinforce the incorrect opinions that they already have.” He also recently released two Mexican-made acoustics with Martin, built from the vibe of a 1940 Martin 0-17 he used on his album Foxes In The Snow. That’s the kind of public move that changes buyer psychology faster than any spec sheet.
Myth vs Reality
Myth: Country of origin is the top predictor of playability and resale. Reality: Buyers pay to confirm their opinions. That creates predictable mispricing you can exploit or get burned by.
Why this matters behind the counter
- When a respected player like Isbell backs Mexican-made Martins — and doesn’t treat them as second-best — it chips away at the simple heuristics casual buyers use. People bring those heuristics to pawn counters. - That means some Mexican-made instruments will be undervalued by sellers who believe “Made in USA” is the only thing that matters — and overvalued by buyers who want the prestige stamp. - For your shop, that gap is opportunity: you can buy a well-made Mexican instrument cheaply, update its setup, and sell to price-conscious players — but you need the systems to spot the real deal.
Counterintuitive insight
Most sellers think the headstock country-of-origin determines resale. The truth? Perception often matters more than provenance. A player’s endorsement (Isbell’s move) can flip demand overnight — not because the wood changed, but because the buyer’s story did.
Common mistake and how to avoid it
Mistake: Rejecting or lowballing a Mexican-made guitar on sight. How to avoid: Treat origin as one data point. Inspect, play, and evaluate setup, fret condition, and tone. If the instrument checks out, value it against actual market demand — not myths.
Mini playbook: quick inspection checklist (do this at the counter)
- Look for structural issues first: neck straightness, lifted bridge, cracks. - Play it: check fret buzz, action, and intonation through first 12 frets. - Check hardware and electronics (if applicable) for function, not cosmetic wear. - Note provenance: endorsements or recent artist releases can spike interest. - Price with margin for a setup — many buyers will pay more for a playable instrument.
What changes now
If you’re still automating prices based on country and brand alone, stop. Start pricing instruments by condition, playability after a basic setup, and local demand signals — and watch margins improve.
Labeled hypothetical example
Example: A Mexican-made Martin arrives at your counter. The seller wants a quick sale and lowballing seems easy. But after a brief play and a straightforward setup, you resell it at a price that undercuts the U.S.-made equivalent while keeping a decent margin — because local buyers now value playability and endorsements over origin. (This is a hypothetical scenario to illustrate the decision process, not a report of an actual sale.)
Pawn Counter Take
- Treat “Made in” as a starting signal, not the verdict; inspect and play before you price. - Artist endorsements shift buyer bias faster than specs — watch for them (Isbell’s Mexican Martins are the latest example). - Buy the playable, not the pedigree: a tuned, set-up Mexican acoustic can out-sell an untouched US stamp.
If you’re in Vancouver…
- When a guitar comes in, plug it into a small amp or mic it in a quiet corner and test it — Vancouver players are picky about tone and action. - Track local demand: note what walks out the door this month (not what looks good online); price similar incoming items accordingly. - If unsure, offer a small setup allowance and price as a playable instrument rather than an origin-based collectible.
One clear rule: stop letting bias set the price; let condition and local demand do the talking.



























Comments